Darwin’s Last Dilemma

In his book The Blind Watchmaker, the famous atheist Richard Dawkins praises Darwin: “Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.” because Darwin’s theory of evolution provides a naturalistic explanation that serves as an alternative to the idea of an omnipotent, omniscient Creator who designed and perfected the existence of these marvelous creatures.

As William Paley pointed out, If someone were to find a watch lying in the desert, he would instinctively know that it had a maker with knowledge and intent and that it was not the product of random, blind natural processes or the result of accumulated sand, rocks, and erosion. However, Darwinians have strived to convince people of the opposite of this innate, logical, and correct understanding that all humans possess inherently, claiming that natural mechanisms can create sophisticated pieces of stuff like watches and all living creatures, including humans.

Thus, it is crucial to understand, learn, discuss, and spread evidence that critiques the theory of evolution.

In the video series Darwin’s Last Dilemma, we lay the foundation for one of the most significant challenges to the theory of evolution, which has reached its complete form through recent scientific peer-reviewed research articles.

The ten episodes of the series offer a simplified explanation of the “cooperation dilemma,” exploring the magnificent realm of living organisms to explain what cooperation means. It is not limited to just a few well-known examples but extends to all levels and forms of life, even unexpected ones like parasites, predators, genes, and proteins. All of that demonstrates the vastness and importance of cooperation, showing that it is the foundation upon which life is built, rather than conflict, as Darwin thought. Hence, there is a fundamental clash between the theory of evolution and real existence. The former is entirely biased toward conflict and selfishness, and the latter is overwhelmingly biased toward cooperation. Consequently, evolutionary theory cannot possibly explain reality.

The series presents all of this in a logical sequence, culminating in the final episode, which presents the proof of the cooperation dilemma. That is the fatal blow to the theory of evolution—without needing to delve into discussions about fossils, common ancestry, DNA similarities, or the origin of humans, which are usually the subjects of unfruitful debate.